@anilkanda · Anil Kanda
Saved 2026-05-15 · Posted 2024-01-09 · Status: New
Full nuke! Law professor takes on the challenge of evolution and destroys it. 🔥 Check out pt2
#God #Hope #Checkthisout #1min #Inspirational #Jesus #Heaven #Apologetics #sermon #scripture #instagram #christian #Christianity #Law #teachers #evolutiondebunked #Evolution #mustwatch #classroom #praise #praisesongs #evolutionchallenge #creationism #genesis #creation
Content ideas (0)
No ideas generated yet. Run /instagram-sync ideate from Claude Code to create some.
Comments (14)
#1. Humans were not alive to watch life form, so to say one hypothesis holds more weight over another just makes no sense. So saying for example the "primordial soup" hypothesis is impossible while also saying God created life when no one was there to see either just makes no logical sense. I don't personally believe in God anymore, but I don't think evolution and God have to be separate. Could it not be that God created the first cell which then evolved into life as we know it? Also, I feel like the method of creation of life is not necessarily a tenet of evolution because evolution discusses how life changed and developed AFTER it existed, not necessarily how it started.
Evolution is based on time and environment, one sided ,we didn't know about cells 400 years ago ,maybe we will discover something new in the future.
1) life is based on genetic material which composite of Carbon, hydrogen,Oxygen, Nitrogen and phosphorus only. 2) just baseless argument why would be two to 5 celled organism, thru evolution organism try to cope up with environmental pressure to evolve into something else, that's y they r multicellular. 3) understanding of chances by scientists is random, not just accident 😂, chance here means after trying for millions n billions of possibilities one solution came out as the best possible version for that organism. There could be other possibilities too but evolution couldn't happen in that direction. Time is not against evolution! Go back to kaw
That is so cool
Whoops!! 🙊🙉🙈
Lawyers have an amazing ability to talk around something while saying nothing.
People are ridiculous to believe this nonsense! This man is correct! We were CREATED!!!
Religious people: "There are no two or four cell life forms."
Also religious people: "A fetus is a life, even when it's two cells."
Who is this intelligent man?
Evolution is proven with the simple banana. The differences between a wild banana and the banana you buy at the grocery store are wildly different. The genetic code of the banana is the same, but activation of the genes are influenced by environment and selective reproduction. That's the whole idea behind the theory of evolution. Also, there are no serious scientist that think fish became cows. Lastly, there are many amoeba and slime molds that are uni- and multi cellular. His option shows a complete misunderstanding of what our cells are comprised of and how they come together to form life.
Bi cellular and uni cellular organisms do exist though, Diplococci is one of them
The only thing is he is regurgitating what he has studied, am not seeing any creative thinking here. So lawyer exactly stick to law. Love you as a brother but you out of your league. Stop it.