@algysinvestmentpodcast · Algy’s Investment Podcast
Saved 2026-05-15 · Posted 2025-05-09 · Status: New
Wait till you hear THIS… 👀
Two famous UK ex-politicians, a million dollars from the U.S. and a “charity” that left me speechless 😶.
#scandal #fraud #corrupt #exposed #news #politics
Content ideas (0)
No ideas generated yet. Run /instagram-sync ideate from Claude Code to create some.
Comments (15)
Dm me
You think?
@garyseconomics interesting info on your nemesis’ wife’s activities.
This is absolute BS. Why is this erroneous content still live. Shame on @instagram for not taking it down
Peter Lawery openly admits he knows nothing about Turquoise Mountain when he says “I did a little googling”. He seems to have disappeared down a rabbit hole. He is either being libellous or knows something and won’t admit his sources. Either way, in my opinion, he’s monied worm.
Context is so important, and often over time these little bridges of knowledge help to clarify a better/real understanding of things.
To run a charity. Half a story can often invert the entire story. You are a very poor reporter of reality.
this is nonsense… Turquoise Mountain was founded in 2006 by His Majesty King Charles III to revive historic areas and traditional crafts, to provide jobs, skills and a renewed sense of pride. How is something set up by King Charles anything to do with a politicians life
USAID did a lot of amazing work to help people from many countries. I used to live in Kosovo and it did amazing work there.
It’s completely wrong to promote this narrative.
🧭 5. Bottom line
• Yes, Algy Smith-Maxwell can be personally liable if his podcast includes false, reputation-damaging statements presented as fact.
• It doesn’t only undermine his credibility; it can cross into actionable libel.
• The episode is false, Turquoise Mountain is entitled and deserves correction, removal, and an apology — or pursue damages under UK defamation law.
🧨 3. Consequences
• Legal liability: Yes — he can be sued personally, not just his production company or podcast platform.
• Reputational harm: Absolutely — even without legal action, publishing libellous content undermines his credibility among investors, institutions, and guests.
• Platform consequences: The episode can be removed following a formal complaint; repeat offenders can be banned by major hosting services.
• Even if the podcast is hosted on a platform (Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc.), the host himself is legally responsible for his words and for editing/publishing defamatory material — unless he can prove a statutory defence (e.g., “honest opinion,” “truth,” or “publication on a matter of public interest,” all of which have strict requirements).
Under UK law (Defamation Act 2013):
• To prove libel, three elements must be satisfied:
1. The statement refers to a claimant (i.e., Turquoise Mountain).
2. It has been published to a third party (listeners).
3. It has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant’s reputation.
• Turquoise Mountain is a charitable organization (which it is founded by HRH King Charles III and involved in cultural heritage restoration): reputational damage can meet the serious harm threshold if the statements could reasonably deter donors, partners, or investors.
⚖️ 1. If a podcast makes false and damaging claims — it can be legally actionable
If Algy Smith-Maxwell published or repeated false statements of fact (not opinion) that damage Turquoise Mountain’s reputation, he can personally be held liable for defamation (specifically libel, because it’s in recorded form).
It’s not about promoting modern art it’s about preserving traditions arts and crafts, founded by the King.