@seek_beyond3 · Seek Beyond | Awaken Beyond The Dream
Saved 2026-05-15 · Posted 2025-08-23 · Status: New
911
#joerogan #drpetermccollough #drrobertmalone #drmikeyeadon #love #instagood #instadaily #fypage #fyp #viralreels #inspiration #loveyourself #successquotes #successmotivation #podcasting #viralvideo #vaccine #summer #911 #agenda21 #motivationalvideo
#alexjones #instabest #standup #motivation #music
@tinfoilhatpod 👌👌
Content ideas (0)
No ideas generated yet. Run /instagram-sync ideate from Claude Code to create some.
Comments (15)
These planes would also require about 6 times the maximum thrust capable of their engines to achieve these speed at low altitude. If you research the operating speeds of cruise missiles, the data makes way more sense. The airframes of the planes couldn’t handle the airspeed, and the engines couldn’t produce enough thrust to achieve these airspeeds… The witnesses on the ground didn’t see large passenger planes, they saw small planes (cruise missiles retrofitted to look like scale models of passenger jets)
It was a missile that hit the Pentagon!! No doubt about it!!!
No planes. Just bad compositing. That’s what the plane sticks out the other side of the building in the long shot cuz the helicopter moved slightly and the mask moved past the edge of the building. That’s why that shot was never aired again and they came up with new angles with slightly better composites, but they still have their own tell tale signs. If you look hard enough you can find footage of the buildings exploding with no plane impact, raw footage without any planes composited in. What about the eyewitnesses? You mean the actors who literally had all the official talking points moments after the incident?
Just like @samtripoli said on jre
So missiles that look like planes? 👍 I can get on board with that theory
Just remember when reading the comments these people vote...
It is very simple; no plain could have brought down the 3 towers... first; no airplain would ever manage to destroy a 50cm steal beam frame... non! A single telegraph wooden pole can cut off a airplanes wing. Secondly a airplane would get smashed like you try to drow a alu can through a steal fence. And third, no buildings ever on collapsing normale (no demolition) would fall in it self at the speed of freefall, which both WTC1 and 2 did. Only controlled demolition can do this. And is the way what i learned in the army in the engineering as a demolition expert.
Bro, I watched it. They were flying at normal speed.
I agree this was an inside job. But how do we explain the videos taken by civilians that weren't the news. I've seen camcorder footage from boats and helicopters. Even some apartments had people filming. You see planes.
Here is more banned information https://Archive.org/details/911-the-world-trade-center
The engine on Murray street was from a military grade plane, didn’t even match the “plane” used.
So retarded that we keep proving this instead of demanding action.....anyone else notice this....nothing happens....ever....
BECAUSE IT WAS ALL FAKED THERE WAS NO REAL PLANE GOING THAT FAST THAT ACTUALLY HIT THOSE BUILDINGS
Where's the proof that these planes were exceeding their limits? You're talking about something without any proof about the actual air speeds 😮
If you look this up,, this post is lieing, look it up yourselves, at sea level these aircraft could go up to 575 mph, or 500knots, with risk,, risk of structural damage, risk, not a guarantee that it would happen,, and that doesn't mean instant explosion at a certain mph hit, it just means that the craft would be flown after it lands without repairs. You simpletons need to do more reading and stop believing these stupid posts.